Sorry this is so long but I believe it to be worthy of posting.
The following is a reply to Teresa’s email regarding,
“How do we go about getting an impeachment started? ”
I found the following on wikipaedia :
The impeachment procedure is in two steps.
The House of Representatives must first pass "articles of impeachment" by a simple majority. The articles of impeachment constitute the formal allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached."
Next, the
Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a
President, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. Otherwise, the
Vice President, in his capacity of
President of the Senate, or the
President pro tempore of the Senate presides. This may include the impeachment of the
Vice President him- or herself, although legal theories suggest that allowing a person to be the judge in the case where s/he was the Defendant wouldn't be permitted. If the
Vice President did not preside over an impeachment, the duties would fall to the
President Pro Tempore.
From: Teresa Keefer
I have heard more and more people saying that Bush needs impeached for treason...how do we go about getting an impeachment hearing started? Think that would be enough to bring him to his knees and start thinking about his actions before he continues to kiss Vicente's butt?
Ron Yeary <ryindy@earthlink.net> wrote:
If Bush is trying to disolve our Constitution and our government without so much as a by your leave to Congress - Thats TREASON and he needs to be impeached.
Incidentally the WND article has been updated / expanded. It also contains links to Canada and Mexico's website's.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tish
Subject: Tancredo demands full disclosure of WH work with Mexico, Canada
Tom Tancredo is SQUARELY on the side of America. God bless him and may he continue his good work. ~ Tish
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=50657
Thursday, June 15, 2006
THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
Tancredo confronts
'super-state' effort
Demands full disclosure of White House work with Mexico, Canada
Posted: June 15, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com-->© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Responding to a WorldNetDaily report, Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of an office implementing a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.
As WND reported, the White House has established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.
The groups, however, have no authorization from Congress and have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
Tancredo wants to know the membership of the SPP groups along with their various trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements reached with counterparts in Mexico and Canada.
Tancredo's decision has been endorsed by Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project.
"It's time the Bush administration to come clean," Gilchrist told WND. "If President Bush's agenda is to establish a new North American union government to supersede the sovereignty of the United States, then the president has an obligation to tell this to the American people directly. The American public has a right to know."
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."
WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.
Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.
If you would like to sound off on this issue, participate in today's WND Poll.